Why This Matters
Fact-checking organizations play a crucial role in our democracy, but they're not immune to bias. While most maintain high factual accuracy, subtle biases can emerge through story selection,language choices, and disproportionate scrutiny of one political side.
Recent studies from Stanford (2024), Duke University, and Harvard's Misinfo Review have documented these patterns. Below, we transparently show how independent evaluators rate major fact-checkers, so you can make informed decisions about your sources.
Rating Methodology
AllSides Bias Rating
Based on multi-partisan reviews, blind surveys, and editorial analysis. Rates sources from Left to Center to Right.
Learn MoreMBFC Bias Rating
Media Bias/Fact Check evaluates bias via wording, sourcing, and story choice. Factual scores based on failed checks and transparency standards.
Learn MoreSo What Makes PoliticalLiars.com Different?
We believe in transparent bias tracking, community-driven fact-checking, and equal scrutiny of both parties. No hidden agendas. No selective outrage. Just the facts, from all sides.
Disclaimer: Bias ratings are perceptual and evolve over time. We've sourced ratings from independent evaluators (AllSides, MBFC) as of late 2025. For complete methodologies, please visit their respective websites.
This page is updated quarterly to reflect the latest ratings and research.