Sen. Coburn: 'Porkers' Win if Congress Kills Earmarks Ban - FACTOIDS
Help us Expose Political Liars!
Find and post them ALL here!
Signup Today and help us
Expose these LIARS!
   

Sen. Coburn: 'Porkers' Win if Congress Kills Earmarks Ban

By Drew MacKenzie

Sen. Tom Coburn has called on Congress not to cave in to pressure to lift the bipartisan ban on earmarks or risk a return of "pork-barrel politics."

In an opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal, the Oklahoma Republican said the moratorium was instituted in 2011 after the scandal surrounding the $223 million earmarked for the Alaskan "Bridge to Nowhere."

The Gravina Island Bridge project became a symbol of earmark spending at its worst, and eventually the pork was pulled. But now Coburn says that would-be "porkers" are back in force from both sides of the floor.

He noted that House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers of Kentucky has called the ban a "bad idea," while Mississippi GOP Sen. Thad Cochran and that state’s Republican House candidate Gene Taylor are running platforms in their midterm campaign races to bring back earmarks.

Coburn also pointed out that Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, has called the ban "a fringe, right-wing idea that has led to gridlock."

Durbin was also quoted by Coburn as saying, "It was a tea party reform. They came in and eliminated it, and what they did is take the glue out of a federal transportation bill. That was the glue that held everybody together."

Calling it the "gateway drug" to Washington’s spending addiction, Coburn said, "The porkers' core argument — that Congress needs earmarks to pass good bills that wouldn't pass otherwise — is ludicrous. Pork crowds out higher priority needs.

He wrote that the Transportation Department's Inspector General told Congress in 2007 that earmarks meant members' "pet projects" were funded ahead of more important issues, such as repairing structurally deficient bridges, "which now number 63,000 or 10 percent of our nation's bridges."

In his guest column, Coburn continued, "There is a higher chance the bridge you cross today on your way to work could collapse thanks in part to Congress's legacy of perverse priorities. Rather than passing good bills, politicians with pork on their minds most often pass bills that aren't ready for prime time."

Coburn said congressional research showed that the number of earmarks quadrupled to nearly 16,000 in 2006 from more than 4,000 in 1994, with federal spending soaring to $2.66 trillion in 2006 from $1.46 trillion in 1994.

After the earmark ban was enacted, spending actually went down to $3.45 trillion in 2013 from $3.46 trillion in 2010, Coburn says.

The senator added, "Congress isn't functioning properly, and the answer isn't new pork, but new politicians. There is no spending or policy challenge we face that can't be solved by electing principled people … and by elevating leaders who know how to compromise without paying someone off.

"If members have to be bribed into doing the right thing — and pork is more of a 'glue' than, say, our oath to the Constitution — we are in very deep trouble indeed."

The 66-year-old Coburn recently revealed that he has cancer and is stepping down in November, two years before he completes his second term.


 

 ...... Read More

 
comments powered by Disqus
 
 
No Liar of the Day has been posted yet. Post yours and vote today
2 0
Please help us support this website. Any tiny donation helps us keep up the Good Fight!
Headline
Nolte: Another Wave of Job Cuts Hits Embattled CNN
Michael Avenatti charged with stealing money from Stormy Daniels - Los Angeles Times
Ben Carson Angers Dems With Illegal Immigrant HUD Policy: 'You Take Care of Your Own First' | Conservative Angle
Loretta Lynch accuses Comey of misrepresenting key Clinton probe conversation, was 'quite surprised' by his testimony | Fox News
Recent Articles
Recent Articles







 
 

Aggregated content may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.